Saturday, December 24, 2005

The Incarnation

The Incarnation, Part I

I stumble at the thought of God sleeping on hay,
With scent of cow manure and cud-chewing blank stares;
Or of God twisting a tiny finger around the young mother’s hand,
As he nurses and drifts to sleep to her weary psalm.
I stumble to see the slow afternoon, the rhythm of planing wood,
Halting to fetch Joseph a saw.
Or figuring accounts of his father’s business
As God plans to change his career.
I stumble to believe that he fluffed and propped a pillow,
Then fell into sleep too deep for storm to waken;
Or to see God, dust covered, with tired feet resting;
Longing for a drink and talking to a cheap woman.
To be found wandering Roman territory without papers—
No letter from Heaven certifying his claim.
To be lumped with every radical with blazing eyes
And visions who portrayed the certainty of society’s fall.
A wine making, mud dabbing, temple brawler God,
Broke, homeless, surrounded by weak and foolish men.
God can be myth and metaphor and image;
A rock, a mountain, sun, light, or sea;
But the sweating flesh of a middle age man—
A descent that would so easily be heresied away.

I stumble at the thought of God incarnated—
But not drunken night stumbling down an empty road;
I stumble at the thought of God incarnated—
Intensely light blinded, fearfully secured, irresistibly drawn.

Wednesday, December 14, 2005

The Shepherds' Play--A Modern Medieval Work

In Medieval times, the Gospel and stories and themes from the Bible were often presented to the public in the form of plays. Even today this tradition survives in the form of the famous Passion Plays still performed in such places as Oberammergau, Germany and Eureka Springs, Arkansas. The movie "The Passion of the Christ" is simply a modernized version of a great Medieval tradition.

In our recent program at Veritas Academy--the Veritas Medieval Christmas Festival--we had a play that took place within the scope of the greater play and program. The whole program was built around dialog among three hearty Medieval fellows who talked, sang, and explained the different parts of the festival to the audience. In an attempt to explain the Christmas celebration to a Viking who interrupted the feast, the key characters donned shepherd cloaks and performed this play based on the events of Luke chapter 2.

We originally read and considered using an actual Medieval play called "The Chandler's Play--the Shepherds." It really did not fit our needs, but it gave me the inspiration to pen this play. So this is a modern version of a Medieval art form written by a middle age modern man.

THE SHEPHERD’S PLAY

Three shepherds walk out with cloaks over their heads so that they look like shepherds. Shepherdess joins the troup. The talking sheep and others in the flock stand or sit off to the side. The sheep will 'baa' every time the word 'sheep' is said in the script.

Shepherd 1:
Ah the stars shine brightly on the meadow this night;
The sheep are sleeping and eve is quiet.


Shepherd 2:
Not like David’s city filled with Judah’s tribe;
Caesar’s register has brought from every side.


Shepherd 3:
Yes, Romans, countrymen, Jews from far away—
All flocking to the city like sheep to fresh hay.


Shepherdess (in an angry and complaining tone, mainly focused on S3):
Bring me firewood and on sheep soup we’ll sup tonight;
You should have gathered it before the dying of the light.


Shepherd 1:
A strange sight I saw along yonder road with my flock today—
A blessed maid great with child with her man going that way.
Twas a strange feel inside like it was the parting of the sea,
I bowed my head and I asked the Lord what could it be.
For many years I have tended these sheep and tended them well
Searching for the lost ones—the ones who strayed and ones who fell.
My days on earth have been long and soon the Lord I hope to see
For as David sang, The Lord is a shepherd, just like me.


Shepherd 2:
Elder shepherd, ancient one with a crook in thy hand,
Why think ye a shepherd gets to dwell in Beulah land?
We are poor, a despised lot, lacking withal a good name,
The Lord would not take heed to us or give us fame.


Shepherd 3:
Tell me of the woman—blessed be her name—you did see.
For I saw one like her in Bethlehem—she seemed so weary.
She sat by the well and did drink, meanwhile her man
Went about looking for a room at the crowded inn.
Alas, poor dame, they went to the stable out back
For the innkeeper said that any room in the inn he did lack.


Shepherdess (busy cutting up a vegetable):
Pity a stranger, pity a woman!
Why not pity me?
I’ve still a meal to fix and I need to burn a tree!


One of the Sheep walks to the front of the scene and speaks. A Talking (The talking Sheep serves the role of the chorus in ancient Greek plays or that of the narrator in more recent plays.

Sheep:
We sheep settled quietly munching along the hillside;
While our shepherds ate and talked and close by did abide.


Shepherd 1(lazily):
Night, ho. My aged bones do call for sleep.
I’ll shut my eyes and let you saplings watch the sheep.


Shepherd 2 (lazily as well):
The stars have many eyes, so I rest my two.
Wake me on the next watch and I shall relieve you.


Shepherd 3 (alert):
‘Tis well, I am awake, these stars are like suns of day;
By the fireside, I will watch and keep the wolves away.


Shepherdess (Even more angry and irritated, especially at S3):
Talk, talk, Sleep, sleep, while I mend cloaks for the morrow;
A shepherd has an easy life; his woman a life of sorrow.


The Sheep steps in front again and speaks.

A Talking Sheep:
And so the night grew deep and long, like any other time,
Until all changed and an angel appeared and glory did shine.


Shepherd 1 (Lying down, suddenly he jumps up):
What ho! The sun!
Be it noon time? What ho!


Shepherd 2 (Rising up also): Oh woe! What light! Even the stars begin to fade!

Shepherd 3: Alas, the day of the Lord is come! The end, the end is near!

Shepherdess (pure stark terror):
Hark! Look an angel doth appear!
Death, death, the death angel shall passover here!


Angel Voice: Fear not: for, behold, I bring you good tidings of great joy, which shall be to all people. For unto you is born this day in the city of David a Saviour, which is Christ the Lord. And this shall be a sign unto you; Ye shall find the babe wrapped in swaddling clothes, lying in a manger. (Luke 2:10-12)

Voice of Many Angels: Glory to God in the highest, and on earth peace, good will toward men. (Luke 2:14)

Shepherd 1:
Praise be and worship to God on high.
Let us to Bethlehem fly!


Shepherd 2:
The Lord had promised that Messiah be
Born of a maid and born of David’s seed.


Shepherd 3:
We must be off, this swaddling babe to see;
The Lord will watch our sheep when we take leave.


Shepherdess:
Here take this lamb for the Lamb a lamb to see.
Hasten quickly to the star in yonder city.


Shepherds run to hallway, wait for sheep to speak, then enter and kneel before an imaginary manger.

Talking Sheep:
Then ran the shepherds through the night to town
To the place where the sacred manger was found.


Shepherd 1: Blessed maid! Noble gentleman! Blessed Savior Babe!

Shepherd 2: Tis joy abounding! Angels told it to shepherd men!

Shepherd 3:
Blessed be this humble earth, this mere cattle stall—
Earth cannot contain the Jehovah who is the All in All—
Yet here is the Christ—our long prayed for King—
In this manger—of whom the angels did sing.


Shepherd 1: What ho! Praise the King!

Shepherd 2: Let all men joyfully lift high His name!

Shepherd 3: For shepherds and all men to save, this Christ child came.

All Shepherds: For shepherds and all men to save, this Christ child came.

Monday, December 12, 2005

Veritas Medieval Christmas Festival

On Tuesday, December 13, Veritas Academy will celebrate the Advent Season and Medieval Christendom with an evening of music and entertainment. Our high school Humanities Program, which is studying Medieval history and literature this year, will be teaming up with the elementary and junior high students for this great occasion. There will be spirited songs, hymns of praise to God, comedy, dramatic performances, including a Medieval Shepherds' Play, singing troubadours, tumblers, and refreshments.

For this occasion, the Veritas students and faculty will be dressed in Medieval costumes. So expect to be surrounded by lords and ladies, knights and damsels, monks, peasants, and serfs. Whether one's tastes are genteel or barbarian, this program should have something to satisfy all.

Originally we had planned a feast with the program. But we are blessed with having more children and thus more parents than we have room for in our great hall. So the eating part of the feast has been scaled down, but we will still have wassail and bread pudding.

I know that in some cases we are extending the boundaries beyond the Medieval period with certain songs and language used. But we contend that the Medieval period never really ended. Much that we call modern grew out of the Middle Ages. We stand on their shoulders in many respects. In certain areas, we have lost some of the glory of the Medieval world. Medieval people knew how to celebrate. We want to capture that part of their world and restore it to our own times.

After the program, I will post the script and shepherds' play, both of which I wrote, so that see what a fun time we will have had, D.V., and so you can advise me on whether I should change careers and go into drama productions.

Below is a poem that will be read by Master Joseph Benjamin in the program.

MEDIEVAL CHRISTMAS FESTIVAL POEM

Think not we Medievals lived in Ages Dark
Think not of Middle Ages so grim and stark.
Our fathers lived in dark ages with evils near.
But in our times we learned to celebrate with cheer.
For we heard a heavenly message filled with light:
So we burned as firewood pagan gods with delight.
And worshipped the Christ-child born long ago
And Him we celebrate tonight with this show.
Christ’s nativity is for us a season, not a day.
We pray and praise and fast and feast all the way
Through winter’s longest spell into Janus’ time.
So join with us with hearty hearts in love and rhyme.
The Veritas’ Medieval Christmas celebration—
Where happy hearts are the finest decoration.

Friday, December 09, 2005

Advent in Poetry and Great Words

Herod’s Legacy

Herod listened to the triumphant sound of Rome:
Armed legions would protect his well-deserved king’s throne.
In Jerusalem, the stones he laid would ascend
Into the temple for his glory without end.
Subjected Jews would fall to honor or to die:
Beneath his scourging wisdom usurpers would cry.
The happy pawn of Rome’s latest power would rule
Killing sons of ambition with whims justly cruel.

But the Magi stormed his fort with most haunting news,
Asking “Where is he that is born King of the Jews?”
Profiting from the scribes pointing to Bethlehem,
Pious Herod spoke, “I too must go worship Him.”
The gift bearers left, camels ambling to the star
Where the God-baby’s birth drew them from lands afar.
Herod waited, but the wise men never returned–
Their cradled Gentile promise having been discerned.
Warned in a dream, by a different way they went east.
Ravenous for a kill, from the sea rose the beast.
“Death to all male children”–stated the king’s decree.
The night before, to dark Egypt the Church did flee.

Herod saw the future–Rome blinded in fire light.
Herod killed a pathway to make secure his might.
First in line, Herod broken by the iron rod
Swung in righteous wrath by the toddling infant God,
Reduced to an evil footnote in history–
Crumpled as the foil told in Luke’s Christmas story.

Take heart, Herod, your political spawn still try
To kill the Christ child with sword, fire, spear, or crossed tree.
Like you, they perish in the dust of tyranny
When the Son is called from Egypt to victory.


And more to words to ponder and celebrate

The Son of God became man to enable men to become sons of God.
C.S. Lewis (1898--1963)

You have come to us as a small child, but you have brought us the greatest of all gifts, the gift of eternal love. Caress us with your tiny hands, embrace us with your tiny arms, and pierce our hearts with your soft, sweet cries.
Bernard of Clairvaux (1090--1153)

Infinite, and an infant. Eternal, and yet born of a woman. Almighty, and yet hanging on a woman’s breast. Supporting a universe, and yet needing to be carried in a mother’s arms. King of angels, and yet the reputed son of Joseph. Heir of all things, and yet the carpenter’s despised son. Oh, the wonder of Christmas.
Charles Haddon Spurgeon (1834--1892)

On this day earth shall ring
With the song children sing
To the Lord, Christ our King,
Born on earth to save us;
Him the Father gave us.
Ideo, Ideo,
Ideo gloria in exelsis Deo!
Charlemagne the Great (742--814)

Monday, November 28, 2005

It Takes a Monk to Save a Civilization

Art historian and critic Kenneth Clark wrote, “It is hard to believe that for quite a long time—almost a hundred years—western Christianity survived by clinging to places like Skellig Michael, rising seven hundred feet out of the sea.” Skellig Michael is a rocky island located off the southwestern coast of Ireland. It was one of the outposts of early Irish Christians who in the 5th and 6th centuries rescued European civilization.

This took place in a time when the old order and power of the Roman Empire had completely disintegrated and when illiterate, pagan, barbaric hordes, who were devoid of understanding the Greco-Roman heritage, were rearranging Europe. While Greece lay in ruins and Rome was being pillaged and plundered, the best of their accomplishments were preserved only in books.

But books too are perishable. Great libraries, like that of ancient Alexandria, were vulnerable to destruction, and with the destruction of books, the knowledge, thought, and poetry of whole cultures were subject to extinction.

For a time, about all that stood between the preservation of European civilization or its descent into a true dark age was a hardy band of Irish monks who were dedicated to copying books and evangelizing people. Usually we think of the Irish as the victims of colonization and oppression. In their later history, English policy toward the Irish ranged from trying to absorb them to trying to obliterate them. Just as the Emerald Isle is on the edge of Europe, so the Irish have been on the edge of the progress and forward tug of history—most of the time.

Although there was never a time when Irish armies occupied Europe or Irish leaders dominated the councils of power, there was a time when Ireland did save civilization. We recognize the name of Patrick, but most know little about his successors, like Columcille and Columbanus, who spread the Christian message beyond Ireland to Britain and then to continental Europe. Thomas Cahill’s book, How the Irish Saved Civilization, is a delightful account of this history.

Two things were done primarily by the Irish during the 5th and 6th centuries. First, they carefully copied and preserved the books that fell into their hands. Latin literature would have been lost without the Irish; furthermore, as Cahill points out, “…there would have perished in the west not only literacy but all the habits of mind that encourage thought.” Second, they established monasteries all over Europe that were devoted to preaching, teaching, and ministering to the local populations. These two activities point out the way for Christians to take dominion over the future.

I recently had a conversation with a friend who teaches history at a junior college. He was bemoaning the fact that his college students could not locate key American cities on United States maps. I smiled and said, “Well, my tenth graders are struggling to understand Augustine’s City of God.” Literature has faced extinction in our own era, but in a way different from the past. In the ancient world, rare manuscripts were destroyed; in our age they have been crowded out by the abundance of technology and paper and by philosophies of education that oppose knowledge. But in Christian school and home school settings, books have been rediscovered.

There have been some useful textbooks written in the past several decades since the Christian education movement emerged. But more important, students are now reading books in the junior high and high school levels that I never read even in college. I repeatedly learned about The Federalist Papers, but only after I taught in a Christian school did I began actually studying The Federalist Papers. At its best, much of my education seemed to better train me to watch “Jeopardy” or to play “Trivial Pursuit” than to think.

In this modern reformation, Christian educators debate whether it is best to read the ancient pagans or the early church fathers. Further debates occur between those who favor Cromwell’s secretary, John Milton, and those who favor the Italian Catholic poet Dante; advocates for Shakespeare lock horns with devotees of Spenser; and some even assign Hemingway and Faulkner to the disgust of those who prefer Tolkien and Lewis. We more eclectic types try to assign them all. But the debates continue amongst Christian educators. In language, disagreements break out over whether to teach Greek, Hebrew, Latin, or some modern language. Even logic teachers differ over whether you begin with fallacies or syllogistic validity. Isn’t this great? Isn’t this fun?

In the Christian education community, we are producing a generation of graduates who are well read in Greek and Roman classics, Patristic theology, Reformed treatises, the Great Books tradition, the Medieval Trivium, and much more. There is no uniformity imposed by a statist decree telling these students what to read and telling teachers what to teach. Instead, we are experiencing the rise of a generation of thinking students who have traveled all over the intellectual globe. They will have achieved Mortimer Adler’s ideal of having read the best ideas that men have thought and written. In one sense of the word, they will be Renaissance men and women. But in another sense, because they are viewing these books through Scriptural lenses, they are Reformation men and women.

Imagine an iron-sharpened generation of people who go beyond “Trivial Pursuit” to actually discuss issues. Imagine political debate where Christians grounded in Hamilton’s and Madison’s views of the Constitution are sparring with other Christians holding to Patrick Henry’s objections to the Constitution. Imagine your children fighting over whether Calvin or Augustine was the greatest theologian. Imagine young people who will be in awe of us who lived in the same era as Rushdoony, Van Til, and Bahnsen.

Some of us struggle to resist watching the evening political talk shows. When we give in to the temptation and watch the shows, we rejoice in seeing conservative Christian spokesmen locking horns with liberals in debate. Such a witness and voice is good, but a few Christian ideas touted by talking heads squeezed in between toothpaste commercials in a national debate will not change the culture. Books will do that.

Today’s Monasteries

Likewise, churches will change our culture. Church should strive to be the monasteries of today. Monasteries are not well understood in our culture. We picture drab, dark places where hooded monks went about singing chants. Instead monasteries were centers of Christian activism. J. O. Westwood describes monasteries as:

“schools, all the way from kindergarten to university, hospitals, hotels, publishing houses, libraries, law courts, art academies, and conservatories of music. They were houses of refuge, places of pilgrimage, marts for barter and exchange, centers of culture, social foci, newspaper offices, and distilleries. A score of other public and practical things were they: garrison, granary, orphan asylum, frontier fort, post office, savings bank, and general store for surrounding agricultural districts. We carelessly imagine the early monasteries as charnel-houses of cant and ritual—whereas they were the best-oiled machines for the advancement of science, the living accelerators of human thinking, precedent to the University of Paris.”


Referring to the works of the monks in the Middle Ages in his book The Making of Europe, Christopher Dawson said, “The greatest names of the age are the names of monks—St. Benedict and St. Gregory, the two Columbas, Bede and Boniface, Alcuin and Rabanus Maurus, and Dunstan, and it is to the monks that the great cultural achievements of the age are due, whether we look at the preservation of ancient culture, the conversion of new peoples or the formation of new centres of culture in Ireland and Northumbria and the Carolingian Empire.”

Christian churches actually are doing the work of monasteries today, without the baggage of some of the errors of the Medieval time. Christian churches and voluntary agencies provide the best social services for our society today. Without endorsing President Bush’s program for aiding faith-based organization, it is reassuring that the national debate recognizes that Christian organizations are the most effective means of dealing with poverty, drug abuse, and family problems. Christians are the ones providing the educational reforms (at no cost to taxpayers), music instruction, marriage counseling, English language instruction, and other needs of society.

There remains those churches that are merely stained glass edifices open to the public only for a few hours on Sunday mornings. But, some great Christian works are being done in places that do not look like traditional churches. The news coverage of the recent hurricane relief efforts in Louisiana and surrounding states could not help but highlight Christian ministries to the evacuees.

The greatest events going on in our day are not happening in cabinet meetings at the White House or in caucuses on Capital Hill or in executive board rooms on Wall Street. Civilization is being saved by faithful pastors, dedicated Christian teachers, moms and dads who are teaching their children about Jesus, small name book publishers, newsletters, magazines, and web sites dedicated to Christian causes, and to a host of other Samaritine-type works happening across the land.

Thomas Cahill contrasted the Romans, who were unable to save or salvage their once grand civilization, with the Irish saints, who changed the direction of history. Cahill says, “The twenty-first century, prophesied Malraux, will be spiritual or it will not be. If our civilization is to be saved—forget about our civilization, which, as Patrick would say, may pass ‘in a moment like a cloud or smoke that is scattered by the wind’—if we are to be saved, it will not be by Romans but by saints.”

We could spend a lot of time bemoaning the legion of dangers to our republic, our civilization, and our way of life. Hilliary just might get elected in 2008, the economy might implode, and gay marriages might become the rage. Congress might not pass and the President might not sign some mythical piece of legislation ending all bad things and promoting all good things. Don’t despair. Instead, teach a Sunday School class, support a Christian school or mission work, buy some Christian books, give away some Christian books, go to prayer meeting, witness to someone, encourage a faithful minister, and pray for God’s will to be done on earth as it is in heaven.

Arend van Leeuwen’s book Christianity in World History ends with this note: “We live in a time of crisis: and krisis is a biblical word. In the Bible it signifies ‘judgment’, but along with that, ‘justice’ and ‘salvation’. The Servant of the Lord ‘will not fail or be discouraged till he has established justice (krisis) in the earth; and the coastlands wait for his torah,’ (Is. 42.1ff.; Mt. 12:18ff.). Holding on to a few acres of rocky and jagged islands, Christians once persevered for a century, laboring to see the faith spread. We here in this land have so much more.

Tuesday, November 22, 2005

Hunting Successes

I envy the comaraderie of hunters. I can vicariously sense the thrill of getting the gear packed for the hunt, sitting in the tree or blind watching for the game, bagging the trophy animal, and even more than that, sitting around the fire with the other hunters slugging hot coffee and eating stew and recounting the kill. I love hunting so much that I rank William Faulkner's novella The Bear as one of my favorite books. I seeth at the gun control fanatics and even more so at the animal rights goofs for their opposition to this most basic, most manly, most American, most Southern of...not pastimes...but quests.

With all this adoration of hunting, I just don't personally have any interest or liking or attraction to actually going hunting. I don't like getting up early; I don't like sitting in trees; I don't like being quiet and still in freezing weather; I don't really want to kill an animal; I surely don't want to have to field dress an animal; and I don't want to be mistaken for game and end up being shot and field dressed before the mistake is discovered. I do miss the fellowship around the campfire, but can easily get over that by propping up on the couch with a book.

So, I confine my hunting to one particular kind--book hunting. The internet has both made this hunt much more successful and much less exciting. It is akin to going to those game reserves where the deer are fed in range of the hunters.

Nevertheless, many an out-of-print book has been found over the net. Used books and discounted books are now quite easily acquired. There is still the excitement of waiting for the sight of the postman or UPS man delivering the trophy into my hands.

The big book store chains are also fun to visit, but the finds are too numerous and the prices too much limit the results.

All of this leads up to some recent great finds. I love estate sales. For the book hunter, these are grand hunts. In recent months, I have found some wonderful selections at such sales. Sometimes you come across the estate of one who was a great collector and reader. Coming away from those kinds of sales resembles Theodore Roosevelt's safaris in terms of the massive amount of gain. One of my favorite cases concerns a Saturday when my wife, Stephanie, and I were looking around at a sale in its final hours when the prices were cut in half. Stephanie found a beautiful large mirror, but more important, in the midst of a poor selection of books--mainly on playing bridge--I found a nice older hardback edition (maybe a first edition) of C.S. Lewis' Surprised By Joy. I think I paid a grand total of 50 cents for that prize. Almost as much fun as finding the book was seeing my students and friends cringe with envy over my hunting trophy.

I have wanted to get the books of Ann Coulter, but have refused to buy them new. I picked up a really nice copy of Slander for just a dollar at an estate sale recently. At another sale, for a few dollars, I picked up a fat volume containing religious quotes and another book of selections by great Christian writers, such as J. Gresham Machen.

This past weekend, I scored one of my great coups. Here is how the hunt began: My son, Nicholas, and I headed out on the trail of an estate sale. Fighting heavy traffic, we came to a sign pointing to the sale. Not much was there; nothing I had to have. (Most people have few books and even fewer that I want.) I thought we would return home empty-handed. But something of the hunter's instinct reared up in my blood. "We must press on," I told Nicholas. Driving on down the road we came to the second estate sale, which was the one I intended to go to originally. So I had followed a false lead--a red herring of a sort! This second house was a veritable labyrinth of rooms filled with furniture, glassware, and other items. I picked up a set of milkglass plates for my wife. (The good hunters always brings something home to the wife to either woo or appease her.) As I started out, Nicholas came to me and said, "There is a room full of books back here." (He is developing a good nose for books.) I went into the room and started scanning the shelves: Not really anything there I wanted. I glanced down and saw a set of encyclopedias--no interest in such. But lo...I glanced again and saw a flash of movement--a great classic was in the bush. But more! I looked closely and saw that it was a box filled with the Brittanica Great Books Series. I reached down and snatched the price tag to secure the find. Then I noticed that the collection consisted of two over-filled boxes--a complete set of the 54 books. AND, most of the books had never been opened--the plastic wrap was still on the books. (Do I deserve my own hunting show or what?) Nick and I raced to the tent outside to pay for the books. Having bagged our game, I loaded it into the car headed home. I kept thinking I needed a picture of me in my book hunting gear with the newly acquired set.

Before this, I had a random selection of about 30 or more older and worn volumes out of that set. I never expected to find all the missing volumes. Now I have the whole set and it is in mint condition. And I cannot reveal how good a deal I got, lest you fellow hunters stumble.

Now in the course of a year, I have acquired the 38 volume Church Fathers set and the 54 volume Great Books Set. If I ever have to go to a desert island with only 2,163 books, both of these sets will be there with me.

Monday, November 21, 2005

The Second Thanksgiving

Plymouth Plantation, 1622, A Year Later

The second harvest was our time of sorrow.
The fruit and scattered memories of the seasons before:
Of Wampanoag grins
Tossing five fresh killed bucks before the women cooking,
Of men leaned against trees with drinks and loud laughter,
The militia’s firing of guns and games of chasing and wrestling,
Faded with the light of the third evening’s blazing fire.
Winter hit hard, freezing the burying grounds
And darkening the sky for months
Overcast and lacking even the hope found in bird feathers.
And the sea in waves of empty promises
Washing against the jagged rocks,
Drowned our prayers and cries, but
Brought misfortune, disguised under a different name.
In spring we planted, the sun warming our weakened frames,
Thawing the vision we had in Scrooby and later Amsterdam,
And the rocky ground yielded up chilled dirt to the plows.
(We remembered what Squanto had taught us so well.)
Summer came with gnats and disappointments:
We built more cabins, but more joined the other village
Preferring their grass covered earthen dwellings.
That fall our harvest broke our spirits—
Storing our corn, we turned to the howling ravenous forests.
In wailing lamentation, we huddled against the approach of winter.
What about our faith? Did our love of God see us through it all?
Did we questioned why Christ didn’t multiply our mouldy loaves?
For the redeemed the crushing weight of rock is not an issue.
Light piercing beyond the crashed entrance of this cave
Gave us reason to gasp for one more breath.
Shivering and feverish, our mouths watered for heaven
And Plymouth’s communion crumbs exceeded
The finest feast to be had with noble bishops in England.

Monday, November 14, 2005

Train Songs and Greek Syntax

Douglas Wilson has said that pastors might be better served by closing their books on Greek syntax and trying to figure out why Johnny Cash wrote train songs. At some point in my theological education, I realized that my struggles with English syntax precluded my ever mastering Greek syntax. Besides, my main problem has always been obeying the clear passages, rather than exegeting the unclear. So I found myself in much accord with this Douglas Wilson statement.

I have another reason for favoring this approach to theology: I like Johnny Cash and I like train songs. Although, he was not the perfect model to follow, I am glad that in my childhood days that I listened to “Johnny Cash at Folsom Prison” rather than some group of long-haired hippies playing on electric guitars. I lost track of Johnny Cash’s music through the years, but picked up the last record he released—“The Man Comes Around.” Certainly the late Johnny Cash reached a wide audience with his range of songs. Whether he was singing about love, sin, God, or even trains, something of his heart went out in every song.

So why did Johnny Cash write and sing train songs? In short, because train songs are part of the country music tradition. That only broadens rather than answers the question. Why were train songs a part of the country music tradition?

First, a few words about country music. Unbelievably, in the 1940s, a governor of Tennessee allowed that country music was an embarrassment to the state. It pert near cost him his job. Country singer Roy Acuff, later proclaimed the king of country music, ran against him, but lost only because he ran as a Republican in a Yellow Dog Democrat state during the heyday of the Roosevelt Democratic coalition.

Country music is a wide-ranging category of music in the modern world. There are battles between the purist traditions and the popularizers. These battles, like any conflict arising among predominantly Southerner groups, is quite bitter and nasty. Without trying to stray away too far, purists would include George I and George II, that is Jones and Strait. Purists would include the Bluegrass musicians from the late Bill Monroe to Ralph Stanley (and the Stanley Brothers)—both of whom were in the ‘founding stage’ of bluegrass music to Ricky Skaggs and Allison Krauss. Popularizers would include those like Garth Brooks and the Dixie Chicks; popularizers are those who are willing to use non-country instruments and styles, non-country methods, and non-country promotional gimmicks. CMT, the country music video network, caters largely to the popularizer crowds; the Saturday night Grand Ole Opry or your local bluegrass festival caters to the purists.

The older country music, or traditional or purist country music, struck chords with human experience. Country music is memory oriented; it is community and family oriented; it assumes a pilgrimage often from sin to salvation, with the sequence being repeated often this side of heaven; country music indicates a better past—when a more godly culture prevailed—and a better future—when either a more godly culture prevails or at least the circle will be unbroken in heaven. Country music presupposes Christianity, faithful mothers, true love, heaven, and the goodness of America. Country music recognizes the existence of sin, drinking, marital unfaithfulness, killings (often resulting from the last two mentioned items), and wicked people.

It affirms the Saturday night grand ole time at the local honky tonk and the Sunday morning worship service. Both happen. Both represent human needs and failures. Both are part of the real human condition and predicament.

Granted that out of the large corpus of country songs, many are theologically atrocious, morally stupid, hopelessly sentimental, lyrically irritating, emotionally nauseating, amorously idolatrous, and sapid, banal, and ignorant. Yet the corpus contains many great works of lower cultural poetry: Songs, or lyrics or poems, that tell the essence of love and loneliness, the pleasures and pain of wine, women, and songs, the ties to home and family, and a depth of religious experience rivaling the poetry of John Donne.

[At the risk of losing all credibility, I will maintain that had John Donne been born in Alabama or Arkansas in the 20th century, given his propensity to write really sensual love poetry and really deep religious poetry, that he would have been right up there with Hank Williams and Johnny Cash. Although this is true, don't try to sing Donne's sonnet "Batter My Heart Three Person God" to the tune of "Daddy Sang Bass."]

All of which brings us back to train songs. We live in an age that is now either bored or unimpressed with machinery, mechanization, computerization, with things digitalized, mass produced, plastic, or glitzy. We live in an age of franchises, making every city look alike, an age of malls and chain stores, and via Internet, every item you ever wanted it available with a few clicks.

But Johnny Cash was born in a world closer to the earth, a farm in Arkansas; he was born in a time closer to a world where mechanization was fascinating attractive, but optional; a world where the city was tempting, but not fulfilling; a world where the train was both metaphor and reality. The train brought relief and pleasure and ‘the world’ to life on the farm. But the train was also a threat to the peacefulness and assuredness of home and hearth.

The greater world was way off yonder—in the cities, cities an uncle or cousin had perhaps visited, cities that a few had wandered off to and never returned. This greater world was a draw: It was filled with wonder and with real wonders. Most important, thanks to trains, the city was something you go to and it was something you could return from. Home was a constant, home with the girl next door, the hills and creeks, the little country church. However fast the train might go leaving the valley or returning to the valley, life in the valley stayed the same, or so it seemed, or so we still continue to wish. (I have recurring dreams of such a place and have not found it.)

Trains in the older rural South were like quests for knights of old. A train might take you toward love, adventure, and wealth. It might take you away from sorrow, danger, and poverty. The goal might be where the quest takes you, or it might be the journey itself. Some knights were drawn on quests for noble ideas; others for less noble goals. Likewise, the train could carry one toward greater things or away from the things that matter most.

Trains, like the future, could not be confined to any simple category or definite experience. In the Stanley Brothers’ song “Midnight Train,” the train was a means of escaping lost love and depression: “I’m ridin’ on that midnight train; my head’s hangin’ low; these awful blues will follow me, wherever I may go.” But in Roy Acuff’s “Sunshine Special” the train reunited lovers: “I’ll meet her at the station this morning at nine, Sunshine Special will be right on time.” In the recent big hit “The Long Black Train,” Josh Turner sees the train as an extended metaphor for sin and temptation, but in the old country gospel song “Life is like a Mountain Railroad,” the train and railway was a Pilgrim’s Progress through the ups and downs of life, successful from ‘the cradle to the grave” only for those who were guided by the Savior. Sometimes the songs, like Acuff’s hit ‘The Wabash Cannonball’ celebrated the power and beauty of the trains: “She’s mighty tall and handsome and known quite well by all; She’s a combination on the Wabash Cannonball.” Sometimes the songs, like ‘Wreck of Old 97’, lamented the romantic danger facing those glamorous engineers of the modern world of trains.

The Great Depression, which began earlier and lasted longer for the South, highlighted another aspect of trains. Hopping a freight was a means of escaping the poverty and hopelessness of many a Southerners situation. Often, the promise of success off somewhere else led to even greater despair. Hence the singer in the song “Detroit City” decides that he will put away his foolish pride and hop on a train and ride back home. So once again, the train that took you away from home was a means of getting home.

The beginnings of recorded country music largely grew out of the songs of Mississippian Jimmie Rogers, known as ‘the Singing Brakeman.’ Rogers helped develop the white Southern country side of the music called the Blues. He sings of being ‘a thousand miles away from home, just a waitin’ for a train.’

That same sense of longing and emptiness comes out in Johnny Cash’s famous prison song “Folsom Prison Blues.” It is the sound of the train ‘rolling around the bend’ that causes the singer to lament his being stuck in Folsom Prison while rich folks are drinking coffee and smoking big cigars and enjoying their freedom. Quite different is the celebration of returning to the South in Cash’s early hit “Hey Porter,” in which he instructs the porter to have everybody stand up and yell when the train crossed the Mason-Dixon line.

Trains represented the potential, the hope, the anticipation, the excitement of something that might change life as it is. People seek such; man longs for something beyond his 9 to 5 job. C.S. Lewis wrote the classic account of this search for something, specifically for joy, this longing for something.

People have attempted fulfillment in drugs (which was a particular demon for Cash), alcohol, fame (which Cash experienced), wealth (yes, his name was fittingly Cash), and other things as minor as diets and self-help books.

For Johnny Cash and so many others, the fulfillment was not in the train that was leaving, but the train that was going back. In his wonderful marriage to June Carter, in his baritone faith in Christ (see note), in his love of his calling, in his security in his roots, and in his songs about trains, Johnny Cash must have succeeded in the trip home.

[Baritone Faith: Defined as faith in Christ as exhibited by the voice and timbre of Johnny Cash’s singing; that is, faith that is manly, rugged, struggling, filled with pain as well as joy, and sure of priorities, God, wife, family, calling, and country.]

While I am thankful that God sets apart some men, according to His grace and their intellectual gifts, to seek out Greek syntax, I feel particularly blessed that God called one person to be Johnny Cash.

Tuesday, November 08, 2005

A War Like No Other

Victor Davis Hanson is one of the more brilliant thinkers, historians, and commentators of our age. He understands the current war against terrorism and Islam better than most. In general, due to his grounding in the ancient classics, he understands the nature of war and its political and social implications in ways that never fail to astound the reader. His book Carnage and Culture is an invaluable history of warfare in the Western world with analyses of why the Western world has triumphed over the rest of the planet. His sequel, Ripples of Battle, shows how war and battles contain far reaching consequences that no one could know from simply seeing who won and who lost the military engagement itself. He is a leading expert on warfare of the Ancient Greeks and the author of numerous studies on Greek warfare. And along with John Heath, he wrote a book called The Death of Homer, which details the importance of a Classical education and why such an education is in such short supply today.

Those of us who are laboring in the trenches to restore Classical Christian education owe a debt to people like Dr. Hanson. He does not share all of our vision; he does not, to the best of my knowledge, share our commitment to the heritage of Christendom; yet, at key points, he is fighting the same enemies and providing wonder inspiration and examples.

He recently made the following comments in an essay on his retirement from a California university:

One tactic that the university has not attempted is a return to the kind of universal and rigorous liberal-arts education that would challenge students. I had little if any success in convincing anyone that Latin, for example, rather than bilingual studies would improve migrant students’ test scores — even though, as a classics professor who taught Greek and Latin to such students for two decades, I believed that to be the case. Most of the time, it was hard enough for principled faculty to fight off such politically motivated absurdities as allowing a course on slavery to be substituted for a required core class in American history, or introducing “Star Trek and the Humanities” into the curriculum. That curriculum fails to emphasize grammar; traditional composition skills; oral presentation and the defense of one’s ideas during rigorous questioning; memorization of facts, dates, and concepts; and attention to history, literature, music, and art. From my own limited experience of seeing minority students of classics and ancient history excel after graduation, I believe such an emphasis on basic education would allow us to graduate once-disadvantaged students with enough verbal and analytical skills to compete with anyone in the cutthroat marketplace.

Thanks to the Classical Christian education movement, there are students, quite of few of whom are minorities, who are now learning Latin and are being grounded in grammar, traditional composition skills, oral presentation (in our rhetoric classes), and the defense of one's ideas. Dr. Hanson labored at the university for a type of student we are now producing at the elementary through high school level. I am thankful for those lonely professors, like Hanson, who have battled for similar ideals. I wish I had had the benefits of teachers like Hanson in the classroom. But I can enjoy the benefits of the Classicists, even though I may be confined to reading their modern English publications and not the ancient works in original languages.

I am excited that Dr. Hanson's new book on the Peloponnesian War has been published. After all, don't we all get quite excited when such books come out? It is titled A War Like No Other : How the Athenians and Spartans Fought the Peloponnesian War .

My main readings this year are on Medieval topics, since that is the course of studies for my Humanities class. But along with reading Malory's Le Morte D'Arthur and Augustine's City of God, I will try to leave some room for some dessert reading, and that dessert will soon be the new Hanson book.

To read more by and about Victor Davis Hanson, follow this link to visit Victor Davis Hanson Private Papers.

Friday, November 04, 2005

Could Jesus not find better choices?

The Alternatives

I wonder if there were late night talks by campfires
When they mistook your closed eyes and silence for sleep,
Arguing radical political desires,
Like shepherds lacking wisdom to tend their sheep.

Their dull-minded full-certainty of mystery,
Only you knowing which one would die full of years,
Rambling men whose preaching would change all history,
Even yet with blurred vision and near deaf ears.

The parables missed; the dozing during prayer;
The quarrels and cutting eyes and willingness to kill;
Such a discordant chord, with understanding rare:
Such fish-handling hands to capture the holy hill.

Greece would offer men of mountains and seas noble,
Longing for Hercules to break Alcestis’ grave,
Weary of the cold Olympian gods’ trouble,
With columned logic and truth and beauty to save.

And minds sharpened on bronze spear-point of Homer’s war;
Their bodies sleek with olive oil, and like Apollo,
Minds of academe trained to question and explore
Thoughts philosophic with schools for Greeks to follow.

Imagine calling twelve Greeks: Socrates, Plato,
Alexander, Aristotle, Euripides,
And rhetors, poets, and dramatists who would know
How to adorn your message with choice words that please

Raising carpenter preaching to speculation
With idols of stone and idols sung most handsome;
Macedonian phalanx hurled against reaction.
The unwilling submitting to your blood ransom.

Yet you saw beyond their Olympian nakedness,
Seeing Aegean monsters spewing vile poison.
So dark Greece would sleep on in depraved emptiness.
Not many wise Corinthians would be chosen.

Greece would wait to awaken with the waving hands
Of a Macedonian bidding invasion,
A Jewish Alexander conquering new lands
Proclaiming your life-paid blood-bought wrath’s retraction.

Roman organization would take up your sword.
Legions of soldiers, not mere commoners, would rise,
Firmly grounded on the republic, at your word,
Decreeing beatitudes; they would brutalize

All those who did not love as themselves their neighbor;
The Senate legislating parables as law;
Conquering lands and building roads with slave labor;
Efficient force bending the world to holy awe.

Crowning you the Augustus Christ Caesar Divine,
To your imaged coins all men would tribute render.
Roman philosophers would your teachings refine
With the hammered correction of grace too tender

But Roman offers to pilot the gospel would be rejected;
Her monstrous salty body slated to be stone-ground;
The mighty Caesars by barbarian graces ejected.
With some officials and slaves in home churches found.

Tentmaker, fisherman, and exiled islander
Captured what eluded Carthage’s great Hannibal,
Leaving Gibbon to rave and others to wonder
How so perished the once thought imperishable.

Learned Pharisees marveled at the stupid lot
While professing God and lusting for blood,
With flea choking searches for a tittle’s jot,
For love of God they would kill God if they could.

With their hidden salvation by circumcision
Proudly proclaimed by blinded lights,
Investing good silver in Judas’ decision,
With only a few seekers saved on natal nights.

You chose weak men of a doubly enslaved nation--
Men who provoked you to be more lion-like than lamb;
They were too few and dull and mortal to make a new creation;
They were too fleeting to represent the “I Am.”


One would think you’ve learned your lesson—
Having eleven weak ones and one betrayer;
Still appointing stammering men lacking reason,
Who deny you by fireside and sleep in prayer.

Still you build with flimsy walls on rock foundation,
Tax collector joining revolutionary
With mild burdens issued from your right hand station:
“Fill the world with my disciples; do not tarry.”

Monday, October 31, 2005

Reformation Sonnet

Reformation Redux

Naughty boys poring over a dusty old creed
Finding candle light bright in a flourescent age;
Pulsation high from reciting the crafted page;
Joy in the finding of a lost commonwealth deed.
Protected by the monarch from the papal state;
Casting off temperance, demanding cups of wine,
Seeing in the nihilistic chaos–design;
Freely choosing to do what was predestinate.
A letter to Rome canceling a trip to Rome;
Farel wrestling Calvin with a doctrinal hold;
Old Latimer’s death fire warming a time grown cold;
From the galley the glimpse of St. Andrews’ Church dome.
Giddy with joy over the bridegroom’s wedding kiss,
Daring the lifeless, faithless monks: Come out! Debate this!

Sunday, October 30, 2005

Reformation Celebration

Celebrating the Reformation

All Europe, once content, kneeling on her bent knees
Indulged in faith in Rome while counting rosaries,
Until your hammer tapped the death knell on the door,
With Latin theses the Elbe River swept the shore.

Could not this be settled with a dark German beer?
Or forgotten with some gold (it’s the Turks we fear)?
No need to stir the masses, let the book stay closed.
Look at the Church’s wealth; there’s no need to foreclose.
Why protest thus, Luther? Have you been blinded so
Not to see where once let loose, the wild boar would go?

You stood there before mere Worms doubly justified,
Your books condemned, your vows broken, and your soul tried.
With German tongue, you bristled imperial fur,
While papal brethren gathered wood for your transfer
You poked anti-Christ till his rage was made full.
You feasted on the fat meat of the pope’s bull

In violent tug you ripped the seamless rotted cloth,
Loosening the thrones of emperor and pope both.
Scattered sheep ran wild, as robed wolves stripped naked fled,
Then you broke your vows, monk, finding a nun to wed.

The battles still rage, but the fortress stands secure.
We praise your doubts and the trials that made our faith sure.
Luther, may we your children, hold our father’s hand,
So glad you built our house on rock, not shifting sand.

Tuesday, October 25, 2005

Eusebius Now

Pioneers and founders face great difficulties. Those of us who build on foundations already established may think we have troubles, but at least we have patterns or forms to follow. Imitating is easier than creating. Traveling a road is easier than blazing a trail. In spite of the difficulties, various saints are called by God to venture into areas where none have ventured before.

Of such a calling was Eusebius, an early church father. Eusebius, whose dates are c. 260 to c. 340, wrote, taught, and preached extensively. However, he is primarily remembered today for his work Ekklesiatices Historias, which we usually call either Ecclesiastical History or Church History. His labors to compile the records and collate the details of the first several centuries of church history earned him the title “The Father of Church History.” His ecclesiastical classic covered the time from the Apostles up through the age of Constantine. The first three centuries in which Christianity was born and began spreading is a marvelous story of the success of the church. Quite often, the successes were as Herbert Schlossberg describes in Idols for Destruction “a series of victories disguised as defeat.”

There are certainly numerous volumes of church histories available today that are more thorough, accurate, and certainly more up to date than Eusebius. The great German American Philip Schaff compiled a history of some eight volumes in the 19th century that remains in print. Schaff was an evangelical believer and a first rate scholar, whose work included the latest and greatest scholarship of his time. His history covers more time and covers it more accurately than Eusebius’ history. Schaff’s research and writing earned him the title “Father of American Church History.” In the academic iron sharpening iron process, even the valuable works of Schaff can be supplemented with better scholarship and more insight.

An exhaustive bibliography of books on church history would be beyond the comprehension of even so rapacious a book collector as me. Studies just on the early church, that is, on the same time period that Eusebius covered, still entails the listing of thousands of books. In the many black holes of historical and theological ignorance that characterize my frustrated life, knowledge of the early church is one of the greatest of my own deficiencies. Just a few years back I would have thought that the word “Patristics” referred to an exercise program. While I now know the term refers to the early church fathers, I am still laboring to learn just who these church fathers were.

My reading on the church history has often entailed skimming the first fifteen centuries and then getting serious when Luther and Calvin appear. Portions of the latter Medieval period were viewed in light of how they paved the way for the much needed Protestant Reformation. The story of the church after the Book of Acts and in the centuries shortly following was sorely neglected. Still several valuable resources have emerged. Henry Chadwick’s The Early Church is reckoned as a valuable book on this time period. N. R. Needham’s two volumes on the early and Medieval church are both noteworthy for their emphasis on the main theologians and ideas found in the early church. My two most often referenced works on church history are Bruce Shelley’s highly readable Church History in Plain Language and Justo Gonzalez’s The Story of Christianity. These works along with another two or three dozen books, many of which are unread, constitute my main library of books on the early church. Add to that my recently obtained collection of the thirty-eight volume Church Fathers set. I can have lots of wisdom near me, even if I have far too little in me.

So, surrounded by so great a cloud of recent scholarship and books hot off the presses, why read Eusebius? After all, he operated with limited resources; he made many mistakes; some of the sources he used were flawed; and his style and organization beg for severe editing.

Something is to be said for going to the sources. Modern scholars have studied Origen and know a lot about Constantine. Eusebius studied under Origen and personally knew Constantine. Many Christians find reading accounts of the martyrs of the early church inspiring. Eusebius personally knew fellow Christians who were martyred in the early church. There is a freshness to reading an original work, even in translation. We look at Eusebius’ account from a perspective where we know of the ultimate triumph of the early church over its enemies. We are evidence nearly seventeen hundred years after Eusebius that the faith continues and grows. Eusebius is writing with an assurance of victory that is based on faith and not on evidence. The witness who from the trenches sees the triumph amidst the smoke and haze of battle can be quite compelling. Eusebius’ account of the early church sheds light on many theological issues. Among these are his discussion of the church’s recognition of the canon of New Testament Scriptures, the power of the testimony of the martyrs, and the favorable change that Constantine ushered in with the Edict of Milan in 312.

The Canon

The canon of Scripture has been the center of battle in the past several centuries just as it was in the early centuries. The parameters of the battle have changed, but part of contending for the faith entails contending for the centrality of Scripture. In recent times, particularly since the rise of the Higher Critical movement in the 19th century, Scripture was put in the dock and judged by theologians and scholars. In contrast to the faithful who submitted to the authority of Scripture, the higher critics pronounced judgments on the Word of God. Their beginning presupposition was that whatever else a portion of the Bible might be, it was not a revelation from God. Accepting that on faith, they then proceeded to analyze (or psycho-analyze) authors, determine the dates of composition, and accept or reject the theological content with frenzied abandon. The Bible was demythologized, humanized, deconstructed, psychoanalyzed, feminized, and subjected to every variety of modern apostate thought available.

The struggle in the early church was different. Some, perhaps many, of the early church fathers differed over whether particular books should be included, like John’s Revelation, or whether they should be excluded, like Clement’s Letters. But they did not reject the belief that a revelation from God did exist. Dan Brown has gotten rich off his doubly fictional screed casting doubt on the development of Scripture and Christology in his best selling Da Vinci Code. But the early church was much more Berean and careful in discerning the will of God concerning the canon. And it must be made clear that they were recognizing what constituted the Word of God rather than determining what was the true rule of faith.

This struggle for the canon of Scripture necessarily entailed a separation between orthodox thought and heresy. The church then strove to find the truth. R.J. Rushdoony, in his excellent study of the early church, The Foundations of Social Order, points out a key difference between the early church and the modern church: “First, the early councils had as their primary purpose the defense and establishment of truth, not unity. Unity had to be established on the foundation of truth, not truth as a product of unity.” (p. 19) Spurious books and heretical doctrines were an ever-threatening danger to the future of the church. Providentially, God preserved the truth. One of the key ways He did so was by bringing the early church to a recognition of what constituted the New Testament.

Testimony of the Martyrs

American Christianity is above all else comfortable. We are comfortable in our padded pews in air-conditioned sanctuaries behind our stain glass windows. Most of us are middle class; we have enjoyed easy access to the great American lifestyle; and our Christian faith has been relatively easily acquired and maintained. For these reasons, we need large doses of tales of martyrs and missionaries. Since we are hindered from Sunday worship by staying up too late on Saturday night, we need to read of those hindered from worship by chains and tortures.

Eusebius recounts the sufferings of Christians in Gaul and other parts of the Roman Empire. Some of the stories of martyrdom, like that of Polycarp, are quite famous. Others less so. At the heart of this persecution was the Roman state, which was humanistic, polytheistic, and fickle. Christians died not for simply following Christ, but for refusing to also bow the knee to Caesar. We live in a time that exalts tolerance, compromise, and polytheism, so here again, we need Eusebius.

Constantine's Legacy

Constantine’s issuing of the Edict of Milan signaled a change in the treatment the church received. Christians have differing views on both Constantine as a professing Christian and on his policy toward Christianity. Some view him as the model of a Christian emperor and accept his testimony as indicating a true faith. Some think his edict opened the doors of the church to worldly people and ideas. A textbook for Christian schools states, “The church of the saints and martyrs had conquered the Roman Empire, but now the Roman Empire conquered the church and institutionalized Christianity."

Eusebius is the source for a much more favorable view toward Constantine. In fact, the latter part of his history is a panegyric to Constantine. Eusebius becomes, in effect, a court historian and close associate with the Emperor. His close association with Constantine neither proves nor disproves the overall effects of Constantine’s faith and rule. But it is critical to see how a believer who saw the effects of persecution first hand reacts when the emperor becomes a professing believer.

C.S. Lewis makes the case that reading old books makes us aware of ideas and perspectives that we are blinded to in our own age. When we talk about what modern Christians need or what the church today needs, we provide endless answers and directions. Eusebius will not provide us a model to direct our next presbytery meeting or church planting effort, but he will give us much insight and encouragement. We will see how the church has grown, but also how it has, in some ways, regressed. Eusebius blazed a trail by committing the story of the church to writing. Once a trail is blazed, it goes both ways. At those times when we seek to move ahead, we need to consider looking back as well.

Thursday, October 20, 2005

A Sovereign God

There is much from my childhood worship experiences that I now appreciate. I grew up attending a Methodist Church in a small east Texas town. The decorum and reverence of church, the mighty Wesleyan hymns, the Apostles' Creed, and the reciting of the Lord's prayer and reciting of the Psalms responsively helped train me in the worship of God. Sad to say, like all too many Methodist Churches, my home church had lost connections with the great evangelical zeal of John and Charles Wesley. The importance of the New Birth, the vital connection of a believer with the Savior, the changed life of a person in Christ, and the living and active Christian communion in body life of the church were long since dulled and muted in my experiences. The Scriptures were read, but the authority of the Scriptures was not emphasized.

It was later when I learned of a third figure in the founding of the Methodist movement that I was confronted with some of the greatest truths of the Scriptures. That third figure was George Whitefield. Whitefield was a powerful preacher who took his Gospel messages first to the churches, then to the fields and city streets and wherever there were sinners needing to hear of God's grace. Several times, Whitefield crossed the Atlantic and preached up and down the Colonial American seaboard. People of all denominational backgrounds flocked to hear Whitefield. Stories of his preaching have become legends in church history. Amazingly to me when I first learned of it was the realization that Whitefield was a Calvinist--A Calvinistic Methodist.

By Calvinist, I mean that Whitefield's study of Scripture convinced him of the absolute Sovereignty of God in all areas, including salvation. Whitefield boldly called upon men to forsake their sins and embrace Christ. Whitefield believed that when this happened, it happpened because the Holy Spirit changed people who were dead in their trespasses to living souls who then believed on Christ for salvation. He believed the revivals of his day were the work of God and not of men.

The Sovereignty of God was a doctrine that changed me and changed me and kept changing me. Every fact of the universe suddenly had to be reinterpreted. Every complaint I ever uttered or thought about my plight in life, I realized, was a complaint against a Sovereign God. History moved only at God's sovereign will; things philosophically held together and cohered only because of a sovereign will; 'all things lived and moved and had being' only in God; there were no brute facts in the universe; instead, only God created, God interpreted facts.

The children in the Narnia series think that Aslan has grown during one of their later experiences in being around him. He explains that he has not grown, but rather their understanding of him has grown. Such is the case with out feeble groping to understand the Sovereign nature and power of God. Coming to a more comprehensive state of understanding God is a life altering experience, and it never ends. I don't think it ends in eternity either.

One of my students from recent years, who I am sorry to say lives in another town this year, thus depriving me of his wisdom, sent me a devotional he gave at his school. Usually I cringe over reading devotionals. Many are sweet, sentimental, touching, and inspiring--all things I hate, all things that only harden my already mean spirit. But when confronted with a powerful theological truth, with a unswerving declaration of God's nature, then my still wicked heart is melted. Thanks to Graham Alexander for sharing this devotion and doctrinal treatise with me.

It has been asked of us that we begin our meetings with a devotion or challenge of some nature. I have been asked to do such this time, and so I will relay a piece of a personal conviction:

God requires utmost respect as the most High Being. We often trivialize this because of our compact Christianity and using God as our medium to deal with life. Reverence has been mistaken with convenience and personal expression. This is not what God asks of us. God demands absolute respect, and for obvious reasons, He deserves it. If you met George Washington, would you be afraid of what you might say to a man who you have heard about all your life? How much more so should we come trembling to the Almighty Sovereign God who created the Heaven’s and the Earth, defied human boundaries, struck down His enemies and delivered His faithful? How much more so? For me to fathom that I can speak to such a Being goes beyond my thinking so much, that I can do nothing but tremble before Him. I am in no way undermining the personal relationship we have with Jesus Christ, but we still need to have the utmost respect towards Him. We need to be ever so careful what we say to Him. We absolutely need to think and discern carefully through our prayers. Jesus Christ is not our ‘home-boy’ but rather our Redeemer and Superior Friend. When worshiping Him, we must discern every word that flows from our lips before we say them. When praying to Him, we must search for Him, respect Him, and humble ourselves before Him. This is why many kneel. This is why many close their eyes. I am not saying if you do not do those things that you are not respecting Him; I am just saying why all these things are practiced. What do our prayers sound like? Are they arbitrary? Forced? Or are they careful, cautious, and passionate? This is why I am very careful when I am asked to pray out loud. I will not pray every time it is asked of me. I will come to the Most High God publicly when I believe it is necessary through the Holy Spirit. I am in no way saying to reduce your prayers, for our prayers should be abundant to the Lord. James 5:13-16 says:

Is any one of you in trouble? He should pray. Is anyone happy? Let him sing songs of praise. Is any one of you sick? He should call the elders of the church to pray over him and anoint him with oil in the name of the Lord. And the prayer offered in faith will make the sick person well; the Lord will raise him up. If he has sinned, he will be forgiven. Therefore confess your sins to each other and pray for each other so that you may be healed. The prayer of a righteous man is powerful and effective. I believe that accounts for a ‘small’ devotion.


I tend now to often forget the truths I once learned about God. Thanks, Graham, for reminding me of Who we approach in prayer.

Tuesday, October 11, 2005

Happy Birthday Christopher--October 12

Happy Birthday Christopher Dawson!

Without distracting in the least from the well-deserved honor and holiday of Christopher Columbus’ arrival (or discovery or rediscovery) of the New World, another man also should be honored on October 12. Another Christopher, Dawson in this case, a discoverer of history, was born on that date in 1889 in Wales. Like the big man of 1492, this Christopher had a mission of being a Christ-bearer.

Christopher Dawson’s mission field was the study of history. His contemporaries included such men as G.K. Chesterton, T.S. Eliot, and C.S. Lewis. They were more than just contemporaries in a time-spatial sense; they were the intellectual and spiritual peers of Dawson. Together with a host of other writers and thinkers such as Dorothy Sayers, J.R.R. Tolkien, and Hilaire Belloc, they were a part of the “m” of I Corinthians 1:26a (“…not many wise…are called”—as opposed to ‘not any…'). In the post-Christian culture of 20th century Britain, as the sun was setting on the empire, as Matthew Arnold’s sea of faith echoed “its melancholy, long, withdrawing roar,” the sun continued to blaze brightly on that kingdom greater than even Albion at its height. Of this greater kingdom, the prophet Daniel said it would never be destroyed.

Put simply God converted and commissioned a host of novelists, poets, and intellectuals from among the peoples of Britain. Some produced great novels, poems, and literary essays. Some, and here we think of Chesterton and Lewis, wrote brilliant apologies (you know, defenses) of the Christian faith. Some, and here we think of Martyn Lloyd-Jones, rediscovered Puritan writings, Calvinistic theology, and expository preaching from the Bible. At least one, Winston Churchill, defended Christendom against Teutonic tyranny, the Nazi juggernaught menace, and the Bolshevik menace, and then chronicled the account in an historical epic. And one, Christopher Dawson, restructured a Christian interpretation of history on Europe and the world.

The twentieth century was in one sense a time of maturity for the field of history. Universities claimed the field, usurping what had once been the domain of true scholars, that is, men of leisure who read and reflected and wrote. In another sense, the twentieth century was a time of historiographical adolescent foolishness. Some historians flirted with Hegelian theories of history and saw the State as god marching upon the earth. Before World War I, they were bounding with optimism over the brave new world of the future. After 1918, they despaired of life or history having any meaning or purpose. Some historians courted Marxian theory with its economic determinism and its eschatological vision of a utopian society. It finally took more than one account of the gulags and holocausts to break them of their romantic love affair with Marx, Lenin, and Mao. Alas, some never abandoned their love or their tenured posts. Into the late 1980s and 1990s, they still gushed over the brilliant Mikhail Gorbachev and scorned the reactionary Alexander Solzhenitsyn and the foolish Cold Warrior Ronaldus Magnus (President Reagan). Those not quite Marxist courted the equally ugly twin sister—Socialism. With a few common grace exceptions, and one thinks of British historian Christopher Hill and American historian Eugene Genovese, the economic determinists added little to our knowledge of history.

The brutal edges of political history cut too sharply for some historians. Hence, they looked at social institutions; they bemoaned the plight of women and the dispossessed classes; they ignored the great men of history in search of the underlying social causes; they exalted environment over rhetoric, chance over destiny, and academic trivia pursuit (which produces dissertations and tenure) over the grand sweeps of history.

And God raised up Christopher Dawson. Nothing new here for God. He had done the same in the fifth century when Augustine’s blockbuster The City of God hit the shelves of the Scrolls-a-Million franchise and stayed on the bestseller list for a millennium. God’s enemies always seem to know that it is not the facts of the event, but the interpretation of the event that matters most. Barbarians sacked Rome: it was the Christians’ fault, so they said. Then spake Augustine. But back to Christopher Dawson.

Dawson was quite an unexciting man. He was quite ordinary looking and suffered from poor health. He was never an athlete, warrior, or political figure. Sitting in Rome at the same place where Edward Gibbon conceived the notion of compiling what became The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, Dawson committed his life and intellectual career to writing about history from a Christian perspective. His life was then devoted to study. He read books, he gave lectures, he wrote essays. Books evolved out of the essays and lectures.

The academic community, as is all too often the case, largely ignored this diminutive man with his beard and thick glasses. He wasn’t in line with the trends of the political ‘isms’ and academic printing presses of his day. Still Dawson plugged away, winning a plaudit here or there, and reaching a small number of scholars on both sides of the Atlantic. In his latter years, Dawson was invited to the United States where he taught at Harvard University for a time. Returning to England, he died in 1970. In time, many of his books and essays fell to the wayside and were forgotten.

But God is gracious to us in matters relating to the printed word. Those obscure books tucked away in college libraries and used bookstores continued to fall into the right hands here and there. The cultural renaissance and reformation of our time has resulted in the rediscovery of Christian scholarship. Books and essays by Dawson began to be reprinted. For a time back in the 1980s, I received a newsletter devoted to the thinking of Christopher Dawson. I did not quite understand his importance then, but I did recognize that here was a scholar worthy of note.

Not all of his books are yet reprinted. Some can still be found only in the used book market, but there are several worthy books available.

One of the best places to begin studying Christopher Dawson is in his biography A Historian and His World: A Life of Christopher Dawson, written by his daughter Christina Scott. An excellent collection of his essays is found in Christianity and European Culture: Selections from the Work of Christopher Dawson, edited by Gerald Russello. Also in print is The Dynamics of World History, which outlines Dawson’s Christian approach to history. Religion and the Rise of Western Culture and The Making of Europe are both useful surveys of the impact of Christianity upon European cultural history. My most recent read in the works of Dawson was Medieval Essays, which has played a key role in the whole field of Medieval studies. And if The Crisis of Western Education is not still in print, it certainly ought to be. Even though it was written some decades ago, the case for the necessity for Christian education has never been more strongly stated.

Dawson’s many works can be reduced down to a key theme or two, the main one being this: The key determining factor in a culture is religion, not politics, not economics, not geography, but religion. All those other things matter, but religion is central. A second key idea in Dawson’s thinking follows: The true religion is Christianity. Hence, Dawson’s study of European history titled The Making of Europe is essentially a study of the Christian faith in Europe. The main interpretive principle of education is religious, or more specifically, Christian education. Christian presuppositions formed the basis for the development of law, education, government, literature, and other aspects of life in Europe. The most apparent divisions of history into epochs or time periods are to be determined by theological, not political, institutions and revolutions. Any hope for civilization is to be found not in technology or evolution or some subjective experience, but in a revival of the Christian faith.

Open almost any book by Dawson, at almost any point, and Dawson will be reiterating these themes. He is not a narrative historian like Churchill or Paul Johnson. His stories will not keep you up late at night, turning pages, gulping coffee, and awaiting the final charges of the cavalry. Dawson was not a storyteller like Herodotus. He analyzed history: he explained the causes, the moving forces, and the underlying currents of history. He gives the interpretive framework for the great stories.

At least one quote must be given: “It is hardly too much to say that it is Christian culture that has created Western man and the Western way of life.” “It is hardly too much to say” and yet with the exception of one faithful Christian history teacher in our local junior college, I never heard it said by my professors. Christianity—or Christian culture or better yet, Christendom—was ignored, minimized, ridiculed, distorted, or attacked. Christianity was responsible for the Crusades, the Inquisition, the burning of witches, the suppression of drama, and the oppression of women—so we have all been told. Young Christians should never head off to the university without the major premises of Dawson’s thinking in their minds and hearts.

Yes, there is a third key theme to Dawson. Religion is the key and Christianity is the religion, and the branch of Christianity that Dawson converted to and loved and defended was the Roman Catholic Church. Like Chesterton and Tolkien in Britain, like Flannery O’Connor and Walker Percy in America, Dawson was Roman Catholic—through and through. So what is the lonely Calvinist (of Richard Tawney’s myth) to do?

Simple, don’t ordain Dawson (or Chesterton or Tolkien or even Lewis, for that matter) as your pastor, but join him in reciting the Apostles’ Creed, use him for understanding history Christianly, and thank God for raising him up. Practically speaking, Protestants may best read many a fine Dawson paragraph by substituting the word “Christian” for “Catholic.” Christians have got to get beyond a narrow sectarianism that cannot reach beyond our Sunday services toward those who battle the same enemies.

Tolkien saw the destruction of his world from the trenches of World War I. He envisioned Middle Earth and told the story of its redemption. Dawson saw the same cultural ‘No Man’s Land’ from his book-lined study. He saw that cultural redemption would result as an outgrowth of the Christian faith. Calvinist scholar Henry Van Til would aptly state this by saying, “Culture is religion externalized.” Christians have to think beyond merely evangelizing the lost and planting churches—and those are both worthy efforts. A Christian culture must be created. It has been done before—not perfectly—but still done well. Christian historians like Christopher Dawson have led the way.

For more on Christopher Dawson's thought and writings, click here to visit the Christopher Dawson Archives

Friday, October 07, 2005

Quietism versus Activism

My recent essay that reviewed the siege of Malta and praised the Christian knights defense of that island has now come under siege. Dr. Karen Kruse Thomas of Florida State University commented on the essay with quite a detailed and vigorous response. Dr. Thomas' articulate and forcefully argued points can be accessed by going to the comments section of my September 19 blog entry.

Below is my answer to her arguments. Probably my answers to her will be no more personally persuasive to her than her arguments were persuasive to me. Why argue? Iron sharpens iron. Argumentation and debate are at the heart of the goals of Classical Christian education of which I am a part. And we argue and debate because we are finite and seeking to understand.

At the heart of our disagreement is an age-old Christian debate (and I do count Dr. Thomas as a fellow believer based on her testimony as such). The debate is that between Quietism and Activism.

Throughout church history, there have been those Christians who seek to pull away from the conflicts of the world and to focus on the spiritual aspects of life. The goal is a church of the faithful; the chief end is personal piety; the attitude is one of seeking God and eschewing the world. This is the emphasis of Christian Quietism, sometimes called Pietism.

The other side is Christian Activism. The Christian activist wants to enter the arena of politics and culture and bring the Christian message to bear on all areas of life and thought. The Christian Activist seeks a Christian political order, a Christian view of war and economics, Christian standards of literary criticism and philosophy.

Some monastics, mystics, Anabaptists, and other groups have sought to create small bands of faithful Christians. Some Puritan groups had such a vision; Roger Williams was certainly in this camp.

On the Activist side, there were monks who were transformed civilization--Irish and otherwise; there were Christian soldiers and magistrates who weilded swords and made laws in the name of Christ; there were Puritans who battled for Christian commonwealths, Covenanters who died for the Crown Rights of Jesus, missionaries who administered the gospel and medicine, and Christian scholars who jousted academia for a Christian voice in the lecture hall.

I am strongly of the Activist mindset. It is their theology that motivates me. I am personally a poor and weak example of such when compared to Augustine, Eusebius, Dante, Calvin, Luther, Knox, Thomas Chalmers, Francis Schaeffer, and R. J. Rushdoony. Still these guys are my heroes.

One of my all time favorite quotes comes from that great Christian Activist Abraham Kuyper, who said,

One desire has been the ruling passion of my life. One high motive has acted like a spur upon my mind and soul. It is this: That in spite of all worldly opposition, God’s holy ordinances shall be established again in the home, in the school, and in the state for the good of the people, to carve as it were into the conscience of the nation, the ordinances of the Lord to which Bible and Creation bear witness, until the nation again pays homage to God.

How do Christians interact with a fallen world? Jesus Christ is King of kings and Lord of Lords and we are not to love the world. Satan is defeated and bound and Satan goes about as a roaring lion. Guard your heart with all diligence and every knee shall bow to Christ. Church Father Tertullian asked, "What hath Jerusalem to do with Athens?" His answer was--KEEP FAR AWAY. But Church Father Augustine said the Christian is to plunder the Egyptians. Martyn Lloyd-Jones says that Philippians 4:8 refers to meditating on Biblical things only. We think it the 'whatever' encompasses even the beautiful works of pagans.

We activist Christians can learn a lot from Quietist brethren. If you serve in Constantine's court and have access to the emperor's ear, it is easy to forget to go boldly before the throne of grace. You can be the administrator of a Christian school and be too busy to meditate on the Lord.

This age-old Christian debate will not be quickly resolved. The answer below to Dr. Thomas is only a small part of some greater issues.

Christian dialog, debate, and argumentation, done with civility and love, will certainly do us all some good.

The Great Siege under Siege

A Response to Dr. Karen Kruse Thomas' comments on my September 19 essay:

Dear Dr. Thomas,
Let me again thank you for your commentary on my article “The Great Siege.” Our differences are legion, but I appeal to a common faith in the saving work of the Lord Jesus Christ who saves us, not on the basis of our web log entries, but on the basis of His marvelous grace.

Let me respond to the major points of criticism:

1. You said that my purpose was more “a defense of war and of a particular political and cultural viewpoint than a defense of Biblical Christianity.”

Yes, exactly. I was reviewing a book about a battle. This was an application of a Christian worldview to a particular event. Christian apologetics is a separate, although overlapping field of study. As to being a defense of war, yes. Since Augustine, Christian theologians have dealt with the concept of the “Just War Theory.” When armed Turkish ships arrived off the coast of Malta, bearing upwards to 40,000 soldiers, the people there faced war, not prayer meetings. The Knights of Malta ministered to the sick, including Jews and Muslims, until attacked. Yes, I was presenting a political and cultural viewpoint as an application of a Christian worldview. Christians must regain the field of moral philosophy where political and cultural viewpoints are analyzed. My view is right, it seems to me, in methodology, although the particular applications may be flawed. Meaning, I am right as a Christian and a historian to apply a Christian lens to history, culture, politics, economics, literature, etc. But I may make weak or even false applications. I am doing nothing more than what has been advocated throughout church history and especially in recent decades by thinkers like Francis Schaeffer, R.J. Rushdoony, Harry Blamires, and others.

2. Your next point concerns my praising the British for the role the island of Malta played in defeating Hitler’s 3rd Reich. First, I am aware of the limitations of America’s involvement in the European theater of the war. Stephen Ambrose’s books make the case for America’s greatest generation, but Max Hastings’ Armageddon: The Battle for Germany 1944-45 has deep criticisms of the American soldiers and leadership. Anthony Bevor and others have aptly dealt with the tremendous sacrifices of Soviet Russia in defeating the Nazis. The historical consensus, I thought, was that Britain was not able to win the war against Hitler, but were able to keep Hitler from winning. I still stand behind the praise of the Desert 8th Army and the RAF in the Battle of Britain and of the units based on Malta. Even with limited resources, Rommel could have captured Cairo and the Suez Canal. The Middle East was shaky, politically. Arab leaders would easily have sided with Hitler. (‘The enemy of my enemy—British and French occupying forces—is my friend.) One of Britain’s greatest roles in that war was keeping the Middle Eastern countries (actually colonial possessions/protectorates) on the allied side or at least neutral. Turkey had old political ties with Germany and even older hostility toward Russia. A Nazi dominated Middle East would have been a domino effect flank for the Axis powers. Iran was shaky. India would have been vulnerable from both the west and the east where the Japanese army was in Burma. The entire southern flank of Russia would have been endangered. The Caucasus mountain region would have provided an open door to the Nazi armies being on the eastern bank of the Volga River. The places in Iran where my Dad served in that war—somewhat later—would not have been shared airfields with British, American, and Russian units, but would have been German controlled areas. In no way am I minimizing the ocean of blood spilled on the Russian steppes. But, along with the frozen stacks of dead Germans in the Russian snows, there were other places where battles also helped defeat Nazism.

3. Concerning your comment on David as a man of war: I agree that David is a great Old Testament war hero. God did forbid him from building the temple for that reason. But God describes David as a man after His own heart in all matters, except in the events concerning Uriah the Hittite. God also rebuked him for numbering the men for war. All in all, God commended and blessed this man of war. The only reason Solomon could be a man of peace was because his dad had cleared the borders. David’s calling from boyhood was killing God’s enemies—uncircumcised Philistines and others who mocked God.

4. Concerning my use of historical rather than Biblical figures: This is no counter-example! Like the author of Hebrews, time does not permit me to name them all. Abraham went to war. Joshua is a great man of war. Moses led the Israelites in war. God raised up judges who were generally warriors. Saul and Jonathan fought God’s enemies. Good ole Prophet Samuel hacked Agag to pieces. David had his own honor roll of mighty men of war. Nehemiah had his men armed with a sword and trowel. Drop the historical names and fill in any number of Biblical heroes.

5. You said this concerning me: “He seems to confuse vicious cruelty with religious zeal, strategic vision, and bravery.” Great warriors have described the horrors of war with far more authenticity than I could ever do. As Nathan Bedford Forrest said, “War means killin’.” Victor Davis Hanson has rightly pointed out that the Western way of war has entailed massive destruction delivered swiftly in order to stop the enemy. This entails some sort of zeal, whether the zeal of a religious belief or nationalism or personal aggrandizement. When I view Nazi death camps in documentaries, then I cheer at the WWII footage showing the advance of the Russian and British/American forces.

6. Concerning my citing of Generals Lee and Jackson as examples: My fondness of Lee and Jackson is the result first and foremost of their exemplary Christian faith. They were Christian warriors, 19th century knights, great men of Biblical faith and military skill. My particular citation in the essay of contention had reference to their strategic and tactical gifts. As far as battlefield skills are concerned, any number of names could have been substituted. Grant’s Vicksburg campaign was brilliant. Sherman’s flanking maneuvers leading to the capture of Atlanta were incredible. We could go back in time to Hannibal or Alexander or forward in time to the American command leading to the capture of Iraq.

7. Concerning the particular case of Valette beheading his prisoners and firing their heads back at the enemy: Context is everything. The knights and Maltese were being urged by the Muslims to surrender. Their case looked hopeless. The Muslims had beheaded 4 knights and floated their bodies to Valette’s camp. He had to send two messages. First, his men had to know that surrender was no option. (Valette is following principles going back to Sun Tzu and his classic The Art of War.) Second, he had to let the Muslims know that he was not intimidated. This was war—and Sherman said War is Hell. Leaders often make decisions that cause me—and I would be a prissy warrior—to shake and shiver. Gen. Washington had mutinous regiments execute their own leaders. Allies bombed civilians in World War II. Stalin sent NKVD officers to execute deserters. Commanders on all sides in the American uncivil war hung deserters. Armor units are called in to run over infantry. I hate it—even when reading about it. The opening scenes of “Saving Private Ryan” are unbearable to me. Homer’s Iliad is a favorite book, but still unnerving. Commanders have to make decisions on the spot that we as historians have to evaluate in air-conditioned classrooms.

8. Concerning the concept of Total War in the American Civil War: Neither I nor the book I reviewed dealt with that concept. Both Muslim and Christian armies attempted to focus fighting on armies, not civilians. Since there were civilians on the island, they were in harm’s way. But it was not the policy. Personally, I think R.E. Lee and George McClellan had the better views of such in the Civil War.

9. You said this of me: “House posits a unified ‘Christian West’ extending from the dawn of the early church through the Crusades and into our own century.” Yes, I recite such in our historic creeds. I believe there is something that can historically, demographically, and covenantally be called the Christian West. I did not make up or create the concept. Look at any world almanac or history of Western Civilization.

10. You said: “The concept of a unified Christian West is…more political and cultural than religious.” Henry Van Til said that culture is religion externalized. The Christian West should have been and should be more unified—we recite the same creeds and say the same prayers. Our politics and culture should grow from the faith and not the other way around. Christendom was tried and found difficult, just like Christian living.

11. You said: “I am of the Puritan viewpoint that the true Church is a tiny remnant, reliant completely and fearfully…on God’s grace.” Puritan theology is not a nice neat pocket size theology packet. Ian Murray’s classic The Puritan Hope certainly shows a far more dominion oriented Puritanism. Also, see the books and journals of the Christian Reconstructionists. Winthrop’s city on a hill seemed to be pretty visible and expansive.

12. Your quote above continues with “…rather than destined to be the dominant rulers of this age.” The dominion mandate of Genesis 1 and the mandate of Joshua 1 and the Great Commission all combined with the Messianic Psalms and with the victorious note of John’s Revelation all seem to point to dominant rule by Christ and His people. The theological debate is whether it happens on this side of history or the other side. In other words, we believers disagree over the extent to which that will happen either before or after Christ’s return.

13. You said, “I am a person of unclean lips, from a nation of unclean lips.” Me too. For that reason, Christian scholars and thinkers and web loggers should discuss and debate and maintain Christian civility, which I believe you did.

14. You asked: “Then how can we of the ‘Christian West’ expect to retake Israel’s lost national (political) chosen status?” Your position is common among true brothers and sisters in Christ, especially in our time. I hold to the older Postmillennial theology that would answer by saying, “We take on Israel’s status because we have the fulfillment of God’s promises in Christ. We exercise Christian stewardship in His name. The earth is the Lord’s.” Read the writings of Rushdoony, Ken Gentry, and others on this. And even if Postmillennialism is wrong, I still think it is right for Christians to exercise dominion to whatever extent possible. This is my Father’s world. (This does not mean that I endorse everything ever done in the name of Christ.)

15. You said that there is no sign of contrition in my article for sins—individual or corporate—toward the Islamic world. I have many personal sins, but none that I can think of toward Muslims except for not praying enough for their conversion.

16. Concerning exploitation of the Middle East by the West: My view of colonialism is best articulated in the works of economic historians P.T. Bauer and Neill Ferguson. Colonialism had many ugly aspects. The overall results have been good. Osama bin Laden went ballistic when the United States got involved with Afghanistan in the 80s trying to wedge the Soviets out. We were doing a good thing. There is a whole library of books now in this post 9-11 era concerning the Islamic mindset versus the Western mindset. My favorite is George Grant’s Blood of the Moon. If the Western world had never touched the Middle East, they would still be a bitter, divided, and poor hate-filled region. I think the issue is far more complicated than you indicate.

17. Concerning Nice Muslims versus Fanatics: I believe there are nice Muslims. I believe that some Muslims deplore the 9-11 attacks. I think they are exceptions to their theology. Some professing Christians believe Muslims can go to heaven; some Christians believe we should not evangelize people of other faiths; some Christians are pluralists. I think all such is bad theology. I think a true Muslim believer would have to look at the map of America and mourn the fact that Allah is not worshiped here, just as I look at Saudi Arabia and mourn that they do not know Christ.

18. You said: “I can only remember with a shudder that the medieval era was also known as the Dark Ages, the very lowest and dimmest point in the history of Christianity.” My logic students would say that contains the fallacies of hasty generalization and chronological snobbery. Do historians still call the Medieval period ‘the Dark Ages’? Read anything by Christopher Dawson; read How the Irish Saved Civilization; read the books on my Humanities class reading list. Read the excellent book by Douglas Wilson and Douglas Jones called Angels in the Architecture: A Protestant Vision of Middle Earth. Read Thomas Woods’ wonderful new book How the Catholic Church Built Western Civilization. A thousand years that gave us Dante and Aquinas, St. Francis of Assisi and St. Benedict; Chaucer and Beowulf; cathedrals and the university; hospitals, law codes, Magna Charta, and chivalry—the lowest and dimmest point of Christianity?

19. Your last comments concern my anti-French bias. Your citation of the military skills of Napoleon and of the French contribution to American independence certainly makes the case that French perfidy or passivity in one case does not imply such in all cases.

I am certain that neither of us will change our theological or political positions on these matters, but the conversation has been a mental delight.

Respectfully,

Ben House