Thursday, October 30, 2008

North to Alaska

My wife, Stephanie, and I will be trekking toward the northwest all the way up to Alaska where I will be speaking at a Reformation Conference on one of the greatest Reformations God wrought in history--raising up Groen van Prinsterer, Abraham Kuyper, and Herman Dooyeweerd. We are excited about seeing the beauty of Alaska and being able to fellowship with Pastor Jack Phelps, who is the newly elected moderator of the CREC. It is not often that an Arkansas fellow goes to Alaska to talk about Herman Dooyeweerd.

Spheres of Reformation:
God’s Great Work in the Netherlands
in the 19th and 20th Centuries






Spheres of Salvation:
The Conversions of Guillaume Groen van Prinsterer

Spheres of Sovereignty:
The Life System Labors of Abraham Kuyper

Spheres of Science:
The Philosophic Discoveries of Herman Dooyeweerd

Wednesday, October 29, 2008

Why the Left (and even some of the Center and slight Right) Hate Sarah Palin

I was just mild about John McCain back in the summer. Several of the Republican candidates had attractive views and features, but no one man stood out as the heir apparent to the party of Ronald Reagan. So, even though Sen. McCain is a bit too old (although I would hate to have to keep up with him), a bit too tied to Washington, too moderate, too cozy with liberal friends, he is pro-life and pro-America. His life story is incredibly moving.

Then he chose Gov. Palin to be on the ticket. I was in dread fear of a McCain-Lieberman or a McCain-Ridge or a McCain-Romney ticket. But I understand enough of political realities to see why such a ticket might have worked. Then McCain succeeded my greatest expectations in choosing Sarah Palin. Like lots of conservatives, I became estatic.

I went from being excited to apprehensive. After all, the media began their gauntlet. Then came Gov. Palin's convention speech and I was on board. Soon I was despondent again. It was the Charles Gibson interview. I never actually heard the whole interview, but I think having to talk to Charles Gibson would disqualify anyone from higher office.

All the sudden we heard the reasons why Palin should quietly step down from the ticket. Unqualified, unprepared, little experience, unclear answers...wait a minute... I am supposed to be talking about Gov. Palin, not Sen. Obama.

At last, Sarah had her chance to learn about government from a pro: Joe Biden. 253 years in the U.S. Senate. He was there when Pres. FDR went on television to interrupt NCIS and offer solutions to the Great Depression and Global Warming. With ease and skill, Sarah began by saying, "Glad to meet you. Can I call you Joe?" Gov. Palin won her debate.

But still we are told that she symbolizes McCain's rashness, inability to make decisions, caving in to the religious right, and ineptness for office. After all, if he needed someone young and inexperienced at government who often stumbled in interviews, well then he should have picked Obama to be his Vice President.

So the Left hates Sarah Palin. The political Center (at least we can admire the Left for having convictions)does not like Palin. Some conservatives, like Christopher Buckley, shy away from having to support Palin when sipping tea with east coast establishment friends at the country club.

Why do they so scorn this successful, attractive Governor?

1. She is not Hillary Clinton. Palin's existence on this political front is an affront to all Hillary worked for. Those 3 a.m. phone calls, all that sniper fire, those shots of whiskey with the boys, the enduring hairspray wars with John Edwards, and her indominable pant suits represented the cause of all women everywhere. And that means, Hillary and Hillary only.

2. She is pro-life. In modern leftist politics, women cannot by definition be pro-life. They can talk to their doctors and clergy about having an abortion; they might even mention it--after the fact--to the father of the child. But a woman who is pro-life is not a woman.

3. She does not just advocate pro-life positions, she lives them. She threw away two perfect occasions to tell the world of the difficult decisions she had to make as a governor and a mother when she decided to abort her recent child and future grandchild. The Left hates consistency and deep hearted belief in practice. (On the left, you can be for public education and send your own children to elite private schools.)

4. She was a mayor of a small town. The Left still utters the mantras of the drunkard Nobel Prize winning novelist Sinclair Lewis, who despised small town and rural America. He preferred Paris. (His Nobel Prize should be posthumously revoked--who reads him anyway?--and given posthumously to Donald Davidson or Robert Frost.) Small towns put you in contact with neighbors, small businesses, community needs, churches, scouts, sports teams for kids, births, deaths, weddings, and very common, ordinary people. What in the world does all that have to do with redistributing wealth, becoming more like Europe, and promoting tolerance?

5. She is the governor of a western state. The western part of the US, along with portions of the southern states, pose a real threat to the Liberal agenda. Westerners still have something of a frontier spirit. Courage, self-reliance, honesty, and hard work are still values in these more conservative, traditional societies. Alaska does not need Washington, D.C.

6. Her husband is a man. Had Todd proven to be effeminant, indecisive, anti-gun, and prissy, Sarah's stock in the Left would have risen. But Todd is even worse than you might think: He works, he belongs to a union (no fair, unions are for Democrats), he fishes, he hunts, and he loves his wife and children. The Left despises true manhood.

7. She has five kids. One of them is in the military. They are not perfect, but they are attractive. That's too many kids, too much patriotism, and too much mushy family stuff. (I bet they pray together.)

8. She hunts moose. It is okay for political leaders to don hunting gear and join John Kerry for a hunt in Ohio weeks before the election. But this woman is serious. Who knows, they may actually be hunting moose to put food on the table for all those kids.

9. She does not do daily meditations over a host of newspapers. Washington insiders and the media are an elite group. You and I cannot get in the door to their parties. But, if you want in, play their game. The biggest news in Washington is what the news says. They don't report the news, they are news. Reading newspapers for more than 30 minutes a day should automatically disqualify anyone from holding office. My advice: Look at the newspaper a week after it comes out. If a story is still relevant seven days after it hits the print, then look into it. Read classic literature and history a lot, but news only a bit.

8. She is a Christian. That would be okay if her faith were generic. Biden, after all, is a Catholic. Obama sat for 20 years under the preaching of Rev. Wright, hanging on every word, except for those that were inflamatory against America. But Palin is a Bible-believing Christian, a fundamentalist. She might actually do something in office based on the Bible.

Any one of these ten disqualify Sarah Palin. Taken all together, the case is settled.

Wednesday, October 22, 2008

Election 2108

It’s October. We better get serious quickly about getting the right people elected to office. Now is the time for us Christians to get busy turning this country around. There is no time to waste. So let’s start by considering what we can do to bring about change—no later than November 2108.

The year 2108 is no misprint. It is a century from now. American Christians regularly say that Christ is Lord, but we rarely think act as though He is Lord of Time and History. We rarely think seriously about time and history. Perhaps, it is due to the American historical experience. We won our War for Independence in eight years; we got our horribly destructive civil war completed in four years; we finished off the Nazi, Fascists, and Japanese Militarist empires in four years. Even the Cold War only occupied less than half a century. Americans put a man on the moon in about a decade after entering the space race. Like Caesar, we came, we saw, and we conquered. Now on to the next challenge, we think.

Perhaps it is American culture itself. We think in terms of speedy transportation, instant communication, and fast food. If we plant a magic bean today, we fully expect to climb its stalk tomorrow morning, slay a giant by noon, and enjoy his gold and wealth by tomorrow evening. We seem to think that politics can be cleaned up, redeemed, transformed in an instant, or at least in an election cycle.

American Christians entering the world of politics display all of the naivety, fears, and misunderstandings of a country bumpkin entering the big city for the first time: “Golly, let’s just go and vote.” Sometimes this naivety takes the form of finding Bible slogans to apply to political situations. Christians say, “We believe in miracles.” “Greater is He who is in us than he who is in the world.” “All things are possible with God,” and so on. If Tony Dungy coached football with this mentality, he might have watched a few Superbowls, but would never have coached a winning team in one.

Then there are the Christians who got involved in politics several elections ago who have now “learned their lessons.” I cannot bear to read their confessionals. Generally the refrain is, “I got involved in politics and took my eyes off Jesus. Like Peter, I sunk in the waves.” All wet and recovering, they vow to never lose focus of the spiritual kingdom again. Politics turned out to be dirty and troublesome. Washington did not welcome them and the establishment did not accept Jesus, so they go back to the tried and true sawdust trail.

Sometimes, Christians decide to charge their lances full force toward yet another windmill. It’s the third party attraction. Perhaps it might work, but just to be sure, find and read the biographies of Presidents Henry Wallace, Strom Thurman, George Wallace, John Anderson, Ross Perot, and Pat Buchanan. (Look in the fantasy section for those books.) Successful third parties do two things in American politics. First, they cipher votes from the major candidate that most resembles them. Second, they may provide an issue or a voting block that one of the major parties successfully woos before the next election.

Those are the options for a genuine third party movement. Most alternatives to the two major parties are not third party movements, but fourth, fifth, sixth, and so on movements. These minor parties, like the Libertarians, the Green Party, the Constitution Party, and countless others, generally garner only the smallest fraction of the vote. Prior to the days of Internet access, you could not even find the final numbers such parties picked up on election day. Percentage wise, I got more votes for “Most Handsome” in my high school than most minor parties receive. Minor parties, which often involve some really sharp people and some pertinent issues, are politically irrelevant. It is like me shooting a few hoops here at home while the NBA playoffs are going on. I may make a great shot from the side, but it is irrelevant.

When Christians do edge toward politics, they are prone to shrill hysteria. Certainly, the political climate can easily engender both shrillness and hysteria, but that reaction never works. For Christians, it usually results in confusion over whether the current crop of evils guarantees a second coming before the next election cycle or whether we still have time for one more prayer rally in Washington.

As if the Christian community itself did not have internal angst and outer confusion over politics, the political and media establishment also misreads and misunderstands Christian involvement. The media love obituaries, especially those of political enemies. Every time a conservative Christian candidate loses or the more conservative and Christian leaning candidates are swept out of office, the media produces its last rites over the religious right, conservative talk radio, and conservatism in general. The media are genuinely bewildered when talking to serious Christians, and this means, serious in terms of the lowest American Christian common denominator. If a media person were to interview a Christian thinker who was on the level of an Abraham Kuyper or a Greg Bahnsen, they would be totally dumbfounded.

There are answers available to us. It is possible for us to adopt a one hundred year plan for Christian restoration. We can expect to begin seeing results long before 2108. But it will involve some hard work, some rethinking, and lots of theological and political education. Let’s first consider where we are.

The year 1973 was a watershed in American politics. Following his landslide trouncing of liberal George McGovern, President Richard Nixon began his second term under the shadow of the Watergate Scandal that would soon engulf him. America’s involvement in the Vietnam War was ending. The social revolutions of the 1960s were collapsing from exhaustion. In this climate, the Supreme Court once again sidestepped constitutional history and Christian common law consensus and blessed abortion on demand with legality through its Roe v. Wade decision.

It was 1980 before the Christian community was alert enough, incensed enough, and united enough to act. Thankfully, one of the three evangelical candidates for the Presidency, Ronald Reagan, had the foresight to unite the Moral Majority agenda to his anti-communist, pro-capitalist, conservative philosophy.
Christians who never previously knew what caucuses, bandwagons, and political campaigns suddenly became a political force. Twenty-eight years later, we find ourselves wondering why we don’t control both parties, both Houses of Congress, the White House, the Supreme Court, and the media. We are like Gomer Pyle, who was able to fix flats at Wally’s garage back in Mayberry, but never got out of basic training in the Marines. Still some learning has gone on.

By the 1980s, Christians realized that the world of political actions, like ideas, have consequences. Since that time, Christian political action has netted some electoral changes. Christians sent some powerful humanistic and liberal political leaders to the unemployment lines. Christians elected some Christians and conservatives. The two political parties, but especially the Republican Party, began flattering, cajoling, and wooing evangelicals. Some politicians and some of the media began attacking. Some of our political agenda has made it to the table. Some of our issues have become the defining issues. Along with all that, we have seen promises broken, elected officials disgraced, our agenda ignored, our beliefs ridiculed, and our political work shredded to shambles.

These failures are among the reasons why Christians so quickly abort political involvement. When you play football, you should expect the other team to block, tackle, and to seek to score. When you grow a garden, you should expect weeds, weather, insects, and varmints to attack, hinder, or devour your crop. When you get involved in politics, you must expect failure, unjust attacks, ridicule, betrayals, and the like. In politics, success is short lived and disaster is ever present.

Christians need to realize how the world of politics functions. Politics must be distinguished from church and theology. We don’t walk into a room of religious types and expect to compromise the Ten Commandments and the Nicene Creed. In the field of politics, it is essential, however, to learn the processes, the compromises, and the rules—external and internal—to political success.

The political hardball, the rough and tumble, and the realpolitik of the legislative process may turn many of us away from actual involvement. That is okay. Not all Christians are constituted to be soldiers, surgeons, pastors, or politicians. But all Christians need to recognize that we need salt and light in all those and many other fields.

Christian education, now taking place in homes and Christian schools everywhere, gives us great hope for our political future. A renewal of sound Biblical theology and practice and the recovery of rigorous academic standards provide foundations for reformation in all areas of life, including the political realm. Christian students are now learning history in ways that highlight the Christian political and social impact upon culture. Christian students are mastering the great literary classics and rhetorical skills that created Western Civilization. They are, to use Dorothy Sayers’ words, learning how to learn.

Now we can focus on a generation of Christians who can specialize in the many fields related to political action. I know the bevy of criticisms leveled against Senator John McCain, for I have made them myself. He is not conservative enough; he is a moderate, a compromiser, a political insider, and is the epitome of status quo politics. I still puzzle over how and why the party of Ronald Reagan ended up with him. I don’t have great hopes of a McCain Revolution like that Reagan brought to the nation. But I think there are some good reasons to support Senator McCain.

I don’t want to deal with the usual and quite convincing conservative and Christian reasons for voting for McCain. I have no interest in reminding ourselves of the potentially disastrous consequences of an Obama Presidency. Here is my basic hope: President McCain will appoint and nominate several hundred people to fill cabinet positions and executive branch offices. He will also choose quite a few judicial nominees. Some, maybe a lot, of his choices will be good. Some will be awful.

But down below the list of cabinet secretaries, assistant cabinet secretaries, executive office holders, and political pawns, will be a nameless group of young college graduates who are learning the ropes of politics and power. Unknown, young, inexperienced, and working at low levels, young Daniels, Hananiahs, Mishaels, and Azariahs will be learning the “language and literature of the Chaldeans” (Daniel 1:3-7). In another generation, these novices will be the political pros, judges, cabinet officers, and leaders. For now, these low level positions are going to be held by young people who either have Abraham Kuyper and Ronald Reagan as role models or Bill Clinton and John Kennedy as role models. I am voting for the first group of young Turks.

If we Christians are to have an impact on the political future of this country, some Christians are going to have to get university training in political fields. This means law, economics, foreign affairs, and other areas of political science. Add to that, the need for degrees in journalism. This will also entail attending graduate school at some major universities, including the Ivy League schools on the east coast. Graduates of Harvard, Yale, Princeton, and other prestigious schools frequently occupy positions of power from the White House to the Supreme Court. Our local Christian college may have some attractive features, especially for the undergraduate years, but a degree in religious ministries from Klunk County Bible Institute does not open doors in Washington.

If we Christians are to have an impact on the political future of our country, in some cases, we will be seeing our daughters entering politics. Part of political wisdom is realizing that the male-dominated world of colonial history is history. Presbyterian Condoleeza Rice, Presbyterian Ann Coulter, Catholic Laura Ingraham, and other Christian women are involved in policy making, the media, and the political world. We grant that most of our daughters will be wives and mothers, just as our sons will be husbands and fathers. Those called to politics will have to balance the demands of family with political careers. This is not essentially different from families involved in church work, for pastors and teachers have their own family and career balancing acts.

Christians will need to get involved in politics at many levels. We are enamored by the idea of electing a president who reflects our views. To the same degree, we are bored by the thought of attending a local precinct meeting. We love signing petitions forbidding same sex unions, but have little desire to register church members to vote. We pore over the red state/blue state patterns, but don’t know the conservative voters in our neighborhood. We get worked up in a frenzy every four years, but we don’t know how to implement a plan for one hundred years.

We rightly honor and almost idolize the generation of Founding Fathers.
Washington, Adams, Jefferson, Madison, Hamilton, Jay, Witherspoon, and others astound us with their intellectual wisdom, rhetorical depth, and political saavy. We forget that by the year 1776, the colonial legislatures had been honing political skills and practicing for independence for over a century. All of those men we regard as Founders were once students, readers of political books and journals, junior officers in the colonial militias, and local political leaders.

We have a hundred years of work to do. Let’s get started.

[This article originally appeared in the October 2008 newsletter for the Center for Cultural Leadership]

Friday, October 10, 2008



God graciously opened lots of doors so that Punic Wars & Culture Wars: Christian Essays on History and Teaching could be written. I prayed for several years that God was direct me toward writing a book. Facing a blank screen or sheet of paper and envisening a book is quite difficult. Providentially, all I was able to write were essays and book reviews. In time, they accumulated. With a little bit of arranging, they took on a particular order. Starting in the summer of 2006, I became intent on organizing these writings into a manuscript for a complete book. The essays--many of which appeared on George Grant's blog or Andrew Sandlin's Center for Cultural Leadership web-site--were revised and expanded. Some much older essays were woven in. Several new ones were added. The book began to come together. Of course, it then took several more revisings, proofreadings, and other work before the finished product arrived on October 1.

We should have a web-site up and running quite soon providing more information about the book and ordering copies. For now, if interested, e-mail me at Veritas@cableone.net. If you want to order using a credit card, order from Covenant Media Foundation at www.cmfnow.com.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. The Importance of Being Irrelevant
2. Punic Wars and Culture Wars
3. Classical Christian Ed: Some History
4. History After Grammar School: Teaching Jr. High
5. That Bully Sandie Pendleton

HISTORIANS & HISTORY TEACHERS
6. Eusebius --Father of Church History
7. Augustine and The City of God
8. Another Christopher, Another Christ-bearer
9. The Making of a History Teacher
10. Goads and Nails: Reformed Influences
11. Otto Scott and the Sacred Fools
12. Did You Hear the One About the Three Historians?

WESTERN CIVILIZATION: CHRISTENDOM
13. Greek to All of Us
14. It Takes a Monk to Save a Civilization
15. Some Not So Good Ole Days
16. The Great Siege: Then and Now
17. Light on the Enlightenment
18. The Crooked Road from Darwin to Hitler
19. The Saved Generation

AMERICAN HISTORY --A CALVINIST'S INTERPRETATION
20. The Protestant Reformation --American History
21. The Reformation in America
22. The Presbyterian War
23. 1776 and Washington's Crossing
24. A Southern Perspective
25. The Greater Depression
26. The Legacy of Francis Schaeffer

AFTERWORD
An Annotated Bibliography
Index

Friday, October 03, 2008

Defending Joe Biden

I feel compelled to speak up in defense of Joe Biden. He has had a rough year. After last night, he knows what it feels like to be an Alaskan moose inside the crosshairs of Sarah Palin’s sights. His year started out bad. Running for the Democratic nomination, Joe did so poorly in the Iowa caucus that he had to bum money off of Dennis Cusinich to get a bus ride back home to Delaware. And then he got chosen to be Sen. Obama’s running mate.

He had three things in his favor. First, he was not Hillary Clinton. Second, he was not married to Bill Clinton. Third, he has been in the Senate ever since the capital was moved from New York to Washington.

In recent weeks, he has been routinely blasted for alleged misstatements of facts. (Which is arguably an improvement over allegations of plagiarizing hapless left-wing British politicians.) We should begin by acknowledging that a misstatement of a fact must be properly defined as “stating a position contrary to those held by liberals.” By this acceptable definition, “Reagan won the Cold War” is a misstatement of a fact, but “President Kennedy was perfect” is a truth statement.

Yes, Hillary was under gunfire with missiles and a-bombs going off to the right and left of her. As Tennyson wrote of her, “Gunfire to the left of her; cannon fire to the right of her; into the tarmack of Bosnia, strode brave Hillary.” Yes, Barak Obama faithfully attended church for twenty years, but never once happened to be there when his pastor cursed and harangued America. Yes, Joe Biden’s helicopter in Afghanistan went down due to gunfire. The idea that it was merely the weather, which John Kerry has implied, obscures the way modern warfare is waged.
But most of all, let us notice that Joe Biden was right when he recently announced that Franklin D. Roosevelt went on the television to talk to the American people when the stock market crashed in 1929. The following historical facts will confirm this and elaborate on other often obscured historical facts.

Critics say that while the stock market crashed in 1929, Roosevelt was not elected until 1933. This is a blatant case of Chronologicalism. This malady, like biblical fundamentalism, causes people to absolutize male-dominated, white European chronological thinking. I can say that my wife attended elementary school in 1974. Chronologicalists pipe up and say, “She was not your wife in 1974.” Only one holding to outmoded Judeo-Christian views of time will insist on Chronologicalism. At the very least, one should recognize that liberal Democrats consistently both turn time back to correct mistakes, like the stock market crash, and move it forward to new technologies. Accept the facts: Liberals can solve problems. Conservative cause the world to be messed up, but Liberals usher in utopia.

Most insane is the notion that FDR could not have gone on television in 1929. Look, a man from Washington, from the Senate, of the Democrat Party, from the Left, who had working class parents, said FDR spoke on television. It is so.

It would only make sense that FDR would use the medium of television to outline his plan for dealing with the Great Depression. Look at the precedents set by his predecessors to the office of the Presidency:

When World War I was over in November , 1918, there was a need for an immediate U.S. presence at the Versailles Peace talks. President Woodrow Wilson arrived by helicopter just as the conference began to usher in an age of peace.

Some years earlier, then-Colonel Theodore Roosevelt, who was also the President at the time—along with William McKinley—put in his contact lens and climbed into his tank and captured San Juan Hill.

President Lincoln is credited to this day for his quick response when he called General Meade on the morning of the third day at Gettysburg and told Meade to expect a strong attack at the center. Meanwhile, Robert E. Lee got a busy signal when he tried calling General Pickett to tell him to hold off on the attack, due to a stalled out engine on one of the Confederate divebombers. Technology always makes the difference.

Of course, there are always technological failures. An e-mail sent to General Packenham, just outside of New Orleans, suggesting that since the war of 1812 was over, he should refrain from attacking, seemingly never arrived. There was lots of confusion over whether Packenham had a gmail or a yahoo e-mail address. Some think Andrew Jackson had hacked into the British general’s account.

Best known of all was George Washington’s texting siege orders to the various commanders surrounding Yorktown. British General Cornwallis, consumed in listening to his I-pod, never realized what was happening until it was too late.

Think of that: Not realizing what is happening until it is too late. It could happen to the best of us.

Wednesday, October 01, 2008

THE ANSWER



After several long years of working, writing, revising, proofing, further revising, corresponding, fretting, and waiting, Punic Wars and Culture Wars: Christian Essays on History and Teaching has arrived.

After having bought and read books for years, I now have a book I have written to add to the sagging shelves.

The nation may be verging on depression economic and otherwise at this moment, but I am quite giddy.